1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 671 N.W.2d
  5. 671 N.W.2d 900 (2003)
 

STATE v. ANDERSON

No. A03-290.

671 N.W.2d 900 (2003)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Matthew Philip ANDERSON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 9, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, Julie L. Delgado-O'Neil, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Robert L. McCormick, University Student Legal Service, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, STONEBURNER, Judge, and PORITSKY, Judge.

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the district court's pretrial order granting respondent's motion to suppress evidence obtained after a traffic stop on the basis that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion for the stop. Because the officer articulated an objective basis for the stop based on a reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that has not been otherwise construed by an appellate court, we reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases