On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the December 7, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to consider whether plaintiffs' injuries here "[arose] out of the ownership, operation, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle," as provided under...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
