1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 315 F.3d
  5. 315 F.3d 1234 (2003)
 

KIRTDOLL v. CITY OF TOPEKA

No. 02-3229.

315 F.3d 1234 (2003)

Frank Levi KIRTDOLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF TOPEKA, KANSAS; Joan Wagnon; Duane F. Pomeroy; Peter Taveres; James A. McClinton; Betty M. Dunn; Samuel Carkhuff; Jim Reardon; Fran Lee; Vince Cook; and James Gardner, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 2, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank L. Kirtdoll, pro se, Topeka, KS.

Mary Beth Mudrick, City of Topeka, KS, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, filed a § 1983 action against the City of Topeka and several City officers alleging that Defendants violated his Fifth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases