SEPTA v. BOARD OF REVISION OF TAXES


833 A.2d 710 (2003)

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA), Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF TAXES, City of Philadelphia and School District of Philadelphia, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided July 28, 2003.

Reargument Denied September 25, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carrie E. Watt, Michael Sklaroff, for Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority.

Richard Feder, Lewis Rosman, for Bd. of Revision of Taxes of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia and The School District of Philadelphia

Before ZAPPLA, C.J., and CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and EAKIN, JJ.


OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

This appeal raises the question of whether property owned by Appellant, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (hereinafter "SEPTA") and leased to commercial tenants is immune from local taxation.1 The Commonwealth Court held that SEPTA is not immune from such taxation, since leasing commercial real estate is not part of SEPTA's governmental function. For the reasons stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases