Plaintiff's arguments that it is entitled to damages against defendant surety Fidelity & Deposit for misrepresentations as to materials available for work on a project in which the plaintiff was substituted as the prime contractor are unavailing in view of the contract language obligating plaintiff to provide all materials. Its argument that the surety knew or should have known that there were not adequate materials to complete the project is not supported by the record...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
