U.S. v. NOSTRATIS

No. 02-10296.

321 F.3d 1206 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando Novelo NOSTRATIS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed March 11, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jehan'Ad G. Martinez, Klemm Blair Sterling & Johnson, Hagatna, Guam, for the defendant-appellant.

Marivic P. David, Assistant United States Attorney, Hagatna, Guam, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.


TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.

Fernando Nostratis appeals the district court's denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He contends that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because he did not understand English well enough to comprehend the terms, conditions, and consequences of his plea agreement. He argues that his inability to comprehend his plea agreement is a fair and just reason for the court to allow him to withdraw his plea under Federal Rule of Criminal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases