1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 67 P.3d
  5. 67 P.3d 85 (2003)
 

LU RANCHING CO. v. U.S.

No. 27599.

67 P.3d 85 (2003)

138 Idaho 606

In re Snake River Basin Adjudication Case No. 39576. LU RANCHING CO., Movant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and State of Idaho, Participants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, November 2002 Term.

April 3, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McQuaid, Meltzer, Bedford & Van Zandt, LLP, San Francisco, California, for appellant. Elizabeth P. Ewens argued.

U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, for respondent United States of America. William B. Lazarus argued.

Hon. Alan G. Lance, Attorney General, Boise, for respondent State of Idaho. Harriett A. Hensley argued.

SCHROEDER, Justice.

The LU Ranching Co. (LU Ranching) challenges the procedures for giving notice to interested parties involved in the Snake River Basin Adjudication (SRBA), maintaining that they violate the minimum due process requirements established by Section I of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I of the Idaho State Constitution. In the alternative LU Ranching requests this Court to grant it relief from default judgments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases