IN RE ARBITRATION BETWEEN FOP


835 A.2d 687 (2003)

364 N.J. Super. 294

In the Matter of the ARBITRATION BETWEEN FOP LODGE # 97 and Gloucester County Sheriff's Office.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 18, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan M. Leming, Westmont, argued the cause for appellant Gloucester County Sheriff's Office (Brown & Connery, attorneys; Ms. Leming and Michael F. Wallace, on the brief).

David A. Avedissian argued the cause for respondent FOP Lodge No. 97 (Bafundo, Porter, Borbi & Clancy, attorneys; Mr. Avedissian, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, LISA and KIMMELMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This case presents a conflict between the policy of arbitration finality and the policy of deciding public safety disciplinary matters on the merits. We conclude that the public policy clearly expressed by In re Charles Frey, 160 N.J.Super. 140, 388 A.2d 1329 (App.Div.1978) (Frey), interpreting N.J.S.A. 40A:14-147...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases