U.S. v. PRINGLE

No. 01-14602.

350 F.3d 1172 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry PRINGLE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

DECIDED November 14, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Natasha Horne Moffitt, Courtland L. Reichman (Court-Appointed), King & Spalding, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

George F. Peterman, III, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before DUBINA, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.


WILSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Jerry Pringle challenges the district court's denial of his pro se motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (hereinafter "motion to reduce"). We address two challenges raised by Pringle on appeal. First, Pringle argues that the district court erred in calculating his original sentence by taking into account acts committed by Pringle's co-conspirators that were not "reasonably foreseeable" to Pringle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases