LAFLEUR v. TEEN HELP

Nos. 02-4160, 02-4161, 02-4177.

342 F.3d 1145 (2003)

Debbie Lafleur, for herself and Sarah M. Gann, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Debbie LaFleur, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Teen Help, a partnership; Worldwide Association of Specialty Programs, a corporation; Resource Realizations, a corporation; R&B Billing, a corporation; Dixie Contract Services, a corporation; Teen Escort Services, a corporation; Robert B. Lichfield; Karr Farnsworth; Brent M. Facer; Jay Kay; David Gilgrease, Defendants-Appellees. Stanley Goold, III; Stanley Goold, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Teen Help, a partnership; Paradise Cove; Worldwide Association of Specialty Programs, a corporation; Resource Realizations, a corporation; R&B Billing, a corporation; Dixie Contract Services, a corporation; Teen Escort Services, a corporation; Brian Viafanua; Newton Pratt; Robert B. Lichfield; Karr Farnsworth; Brent M. Facer, Defendants-Appellees. Nadia Doubinin, for herself, and Alex Doubinin, a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Nadia Doubinin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Teen Help, a partnership; Worldwide Association of Specialty Programs, a corporation; Resource Realizations, a corporation; R&B Billing, a corporation; Dixie Contract Services, a corporation; Teen Escort Services, a corporation; Youth Programs International, a corporation; Ken Kay; Robert B. Lichfield; Karr Farnsworth; Brent M. Facer, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

September 3, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. Burton, West Jordan, UT, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Fred R. Silvester and Spencer Siebers of Silvester & Conroy, L.C., Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and O'BRIEN, Circuit Judges.


PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

We consider these three cases together because they are all based on similar facts, they all name substantially the same defendants, and the same attorney represents all plaintiffs. In each case, the respective plaintiffs' claims were dismissed by the district court and all plaintiffs appeal. Our jurisdiction arises from 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm the judgments entered in all three cases.1

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases