1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 660 N.W.2d
  5. 660 N.W.2d 821 (2003)
 

STAR TRIBUNE v. CITY OF ST. PAUL

No. C5-02-1931.

660 N.W.2d 821 (2003)

STAR TRIBUNE, published by The Star Tribune Company, Respondent, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, Minnesota, and its Department of Police, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 13, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Anfinson, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Manuel J. Cervantes, City Attorney, Reyne M. Rofuth, Assistant City Attorney, Saint Paul, for appellant.

Mark W. Gehan, Collins, Buckley, Sauntry & Haugh, P.L.L.P., Saint Paul, for amicus curiae.

Considered and decided by WRIGHT, Presiding Judge, and RANDALL, Judge, and SHUMAKER, Judge.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Respondent Star Tribune brought an action against the City of St. Paul under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn.Stat. ch. 13 (2002), seeking access to information the St. Paul Police Department gathered regarding racial profiling in traffic stops from April to December 2000. While the City made a summary report public, the officer/squad identity information in the raw data was not disclosed based on the City's conclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases