WEISHAUS v. WEISHAUS


822 A.2d 656 (2003)

360 N.J. Super. 281

Sydney WEISHAUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin WEISHAUS, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 20, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen H. Roth, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Roth and Michele M. DeSantis, on the brief).

Lorraine R. Breitman, argued the cause for respondent (Rose & DeFuccio, attorneys, Hackensack; Ms. Breitman, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, WECKER and FUENTES.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FUENTES, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Sydney Weishaus (now Silver) appeals from a final judgment of divorce entered by the Family Part setting the amount of alimony to be paid by defendant based on the court's determination of the standard of living enjoyed by the parties during their marriage. Plaintiff argues that the Family Part erred in two respects. First, the court failed to consider the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases