PER CURIAM.
The appellant was fired because she had removed a "tester" from the shop at which she was employed. It was undisputed, however, that she did not do so for her own purposes, but instead gave the item to employees of another business for services it had provided to the store at no cost. We reverse the denial of the unemployment compensation benefits below on the grounds stated by the Chair of the Unemployment Appeals Commission's dissenting opinion.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.