1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 814 A.2d
  5. 814 A.2d 637 (2003)
 

FOX v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST MILFORD

814 A.2d 637 (2003)

357 N.J. Super. 123

Marie B. FOX, Robert L. Keller and Buck Mountain Associates, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST MILFORD, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 22, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman I. Klein, Clifton, argued the cause for appellants (Carlet, Garrison, Klein & Zaretsky, attorneys; Mr. Klein and Robert. S. Getman, on the brief).

Robert H. Oostdyk, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Johnson, Murphy, Hubner, McKeon, Wubbenhorst & Appelt, attorneys; Mr. Oostdyk and Martin F. Murphy, Riverdale, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, WALLACE, JR. and AXELRAD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Marie B. Fox, Robert L. Keller, and their partnership, Buck Mountain Associates, brought this inverse condemnation action against the defendant Township of West Milford claiming that the Township's ordinance that vacated the public interest in roads running through their property left it landlocked and consequently deprived them of any reasonable use...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases