WHIRLPOOL CORP. v. CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.

No. CV 01-00187 DAE-BMK.

293 F.Supp.2d 1144 (2003)

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., a New York corporation; CGBN, Inc., a Hawai`i corporation; Michael Clifford; Edwin Bowling; Frances Haller-Bowling; Raymond Iwamoto; Kurt Glassman; Does Individuals 1-50; Doe Partnerships, Corporations or Other Entities 1-20, Defendants, and CG Development, Inc., F & J Movers, and Renee K. Costa, Additional Crossclaim Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Hawai`i.

October 31, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy J. Hogan, Lynch Ichida Thompson Kim & Hirota, Honolulu, HI, for Whirlpool Corporation, a Delaware corporation, plaintiff.

Paul Alston, Louise K.Y. Ing, Lea O. Hong, Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI, Robert E. Badger, Jr., Honolulu, HI, for CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc.

Ted N. Pettit, Roger S. Moseley, Christopher J. Muzzi, Case Bigelow & Lombardi, Honolulu, HI, Robert E. Badger, Jr., Honolulu, HI, for GCBN, Inc.

Margery S. Bronster, Office of the Attorney General-Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, Ted N. Pettit, Roger S. Moseley, Christopher J. Muzzi, Case Bigelow & Lombardi, Honolulu, HI, Robert E. Badger, Jr., Honolulu, HI, for Michael Clifford.

Margery S. Bronster, Hilary Benson Gangnes, Jeannette E. Holmes, Bronster Crabtree & Hoshibata, Honolulu, HI, Robert E. Badger, Jr., Honolulu, HI, for Edwin Bowling, Frances Haller-Bowling.

Calvin E. Young, John S. Nishimoto, Steven L. Goto, Ayabe Chong Nishimoto Sia & Nakamura, Honolulu, HI, Robert E. Badger, Jr., Honolulu, HI, for Raymond Iwamoto.

Robert E. Badger, Jr., Honolulu, HI, for Doe Individuals 1-50, Doe Partnerships, Corporations and/or other Entities 1-20.

Robert E. Badger, Jr., Honolulu, HI, Eric J. Glassman, Mennemeir Glassman & Stroud LLP, Sacramento, CA, for Kurt Glassman.


ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT

DAVID ALAN EZRA, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d), the court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing. After reviewing Defendant/Cross-Claimant THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.'s ("CIT's") Appeal and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the court AFFIRMS the Magistrate Order Granting Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases