1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 116 S.W.3d
  5. 116 S.W.3d 26 (2003)
 

HERNANDEZ v. STATE

No. 2053-01.

116 S.W.3d 26 (2003)

Arturo Chavez HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

June 4, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guy Williams, Corpus Christi, for Appellant.

Jeffrey L. Van Horn, First Asst. State Atty., Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The present case involves the admissibility of scientific evidence under Texas Rule of Evidence 702 and Kelly v. State.1 Specifically, we granted the State's following three grounds for review:

1) Must a party seeking to introduce evidence of a scientific principle always present evidence sufficient to satisfy the test of Kelly v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases