1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 268 F.Supp.2d
  5. 268 F.Supp.2d 1148 (2003)
 

CHIRON CORP. v. GENENTECH, INC.

No. CIV.S-00-1252 WBS GG.

268 F.Supp.2d 1148 (2003)

CHIRON CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. GENENTECH, INC. Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

June 24, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Joseph Riley, Morrison and Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Eric S. Walters, Morrison and Foerster, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff.

Jack Vivian Lovell, Hunter Richey Di-Benedetto and Eisenbeis, Sacramento, CA, James M. Emery, Michael David Celio, Keker and Van Nest, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

James M. Emery, Keker and Van Nest, Henry C. Bunsow, Howrey Simon Arnold and White, San Francisco, CA, for Counter-Claimant.

Rachel Krevans, Morrison and Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Counter-Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PRIORITY, ANTICIPATION, WRITTEN DESCRIPTION, EABLEMENT, BEST MODE, UTILTY

SHUBB, District Judge.

In a separate order, the court has determined that Genentech's product, Herceptin, infringes Chiron's U.S. Patent No. 6,054,561 ("'561 patent"). Chiron and Genentech now bring cross motions for summary judgment on Genentech's anticipation, written description and enablement defenses under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 112. These cross motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases