1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 674 N.W.2d
  5. 674 N.W.2d 731 (2003)
 

VAN REKEN v. DARDEN, NEEF & HEITSCH

Docket No. 240478.

674 N.W.2d 731 (2003)

259 Mich. App. 454

Stanley VAN REKEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DARDEN, NEEF & HEITSCH and Lawrence D. Heitsch, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided November 20, 2003, at 9:00 a.m.

Released for Publication February 11, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel I. Weberman, West Bloomfield, for the plaintiff.

Lawrence D. Heitsch, Birmingham, for the defendants.

Before: O'CONNELL, P.J., and JANSEN and FORT HOOD, JJ.

JANSEN, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a circuit court order granting defendants' motion for reconsideration and denying plaintiff's motion for summary disposition.1 We reverse and remand.

Following a jury verdict, a judgment in the amount of $115,691.96 was entered on March 7, 1991, in favor of plaintiff, who, apparently, sued defendants for legal malpractice. An amended "final judgment" was entered on July 29, 1991.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases