1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 323 F.3d
  5. 323 F.3d 1081 (2003)
 

AT&T CORP. v. F.C.C.

No. 01-1485.

323 F.3d 1081 (2003)

AT&T CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 8, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Meron argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Joseph R. Guerra, Jonathan Cohn, Mark C. Rosenblum, and Peter H. Jacoby.

Richard K. Welch, Associate General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jane E. Mago, General Counsel, John E. Ingle, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Lisa E. Boehley, Counsel, and Catherine G. O'Sullivan, Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, and Steven J. Mintz, Counsel.

Before: TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

The Federal Communications Commission assessed $80,000 in forfeiture penalties against AT&T for "slamming" two customers — that is, changing their long-distance telephone service without their authorization. Having paid the forfeiture, AT&T now petitions for review, arguing that in both instances it complied with the Commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases