1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 326 F.3d
  5. 326 F.3d 1070 (2003)
 

FREUND v. NYCOMED AMERSHAM

Nos. 01-56491, 01-56494.

326 F.3d 1070 (2003)

Jeffrey R. FREUND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. NYCOMED AMERSHAM, a business entity, form unknown; Amersham Holdings, Inc.; Nycomed Amersham Imaging, a division of Nycomed Amersham; Amersham/ Medi-Physics, Inc., a division of Nycomed Amersham, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 22, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. Peterson, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellants-cross-appellees.

John S. Adler, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Before CANBY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge CANBY. Opinion dissenting in part by Judge GOULD.

OPINION

CANBY, Circuit Judge.

A jury in district court found that defendant Nycomed Amersham1 had wrongfully terminated the employment of plaintiff Jeffrey R. Freund for making bona-fide safety complaints, thereby committing the California state-law tort of wrongful termination in violation of public policy. The jury awarded compensatory damages of $1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases