1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 316 F.3d
  5. 316 F.3d 1074 (2003)
 

DAHL v. ROSENFELD

No. 01-16919.

316 F.3d 1074 (2003)

Randall C. DAHL; Ron Jorgensen; Kenneth Wierzbicki; Neville Hill; Erik Thomas; Eric R. Metzler; John Norton; Darrel Schexnider; and John R. Schley, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David A. ROSENFELD, Esq., Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, a Professional Corporation, and Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 23, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Oakland, CA, pro se, for the defendants-appellants.

Patrick J. Waltz, Waltz Law Firm, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

Before HAWKINS, GRABER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellees Randall Dahl and his co-workers ("Dahl") filed a complaint in California Superior Court alleging that Appellants David Rosenfeld and his law firm ("law firm") committed legal malpractice by not adequately enforcing a provision of a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA"). The law firm removed the case to federal court. The district court remanded the matter to California Superior Court and awarded the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases