Elmo SHROPSHIRE, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
The FRED RAPPOPORT COMPANY, Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 3, 2003.
October 3, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Sanford M. Cipinko, Douglas P. OhKeith, Law Offices of Sanford M. Cipinko, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs.
Richard C. Leonard, David N. Schultz, Leonard, Dicker & Schreiber, Beverly Hills, CA, for Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
ORDER:
DENYING MOTION OF DEFENDANT THE FRED RAPPOPORT COMPANY: (1) TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY ACTION; AND (2) TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER FOR IMPROPER VENUE, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER FOR CONVENIENCE [Docket No. 10]; and
DENYING MOTION OF DEFENDANT THE FRED RAPPOPORT COMPANY TO STRIKE SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF FOR...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.