1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 835 A.2d
  5. 835 A.2d 542 (2003)
 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE v. TINSKY

Misc. AG No. 7 & 20, Sept. Term, 2002.

835 A.2d 542 (2003)

377 Md. 646

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Craig Robert TINSKY.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

November 10, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel and James P. Botluk, Assistant Bar Counsel for the Attorney Commission of Maryland, for petitioner.

No argument on behalf of respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ.

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

The Respondent, Craig Robert Tinsky, was admitted to the Bar of this Court on December 15, 1994. He presently does not maintain a law office in Maryland.

On March 19, 2002 and April 17, 2002, the Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-712(b)(5),1 filed two petitions with this Court for disciplinary action against Tinsky...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases