The motion court correctly determined that, under the circumstances, eve-of-trial notice given to defendant insurer nearly eight months after its insured was properly named as a third-party defendant in the underlying personal injury action was untimely as a matter of law. We reject appellants' waiver, estoppel and correctable misnomer arguments because, among other reasons, in a letter disclaiming coverage the insurer had previously warned that coverage would be provided...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.