U.S. v. FOREMAN

No. 02-10049.

329 F.3d 1037 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Conrad FOREMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed May 21, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan D. Soglin, Staff Attorney First District Appellate Project, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant.

John H. Hemann, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before B. FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

Conrad Foreman ("Foreman") appeals the district court's denial of his motion for substitution of counsel. Foreman appeals also the amount of restitution the district court imposed after he pled guilty to three offenses involving forged securities. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Foreman and two codefendants, Alwin Dacosta ("Dacosta") and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases