1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 833 A.2d
  5. 833 A.2d 518 (2003)
 

HOLIDAY UNIVERSAL, INC. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY

No. 74, Sept. Term, 2002.

833 A.2d 518 (2003)

377 Md. 305

HOLIDAY UNIVERSAL, INC., et al. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland, et al.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

October 9, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter F. Axelrad (Frederick C. Sussman of Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A., on brief), Annapolis, for appellants/cross-appellees.

Marc P. Hansen, Chief, Division of General Counsel (Charles W. Thompson, Jr., County Attorney, and Karen L. Federman Henry Principal Counsel for Appeals, on brief), Rockville, for appellees/cross-appellants.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ.

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

In this action, the appellants challenge an ordinance enacted by the Montgomery County Council, which enables Montgomery County to regulate a future service contract where the performance of the contract is "primarily" in Montgomery County or, regardless of where performance takes place, when the contract is merely signed in Montgomery County.1 The dispositive issue before us...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases