1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 784 N.E.2d
  5. 784 N.E.2d 551 (2003)
 

TINCHER v. DAVIDSON

No. 49A02-0208-CV-674.

784 N.E.2d 551 (2003)

Brian S. TINCHER, Appellant-Defendant, v. Brian S. DAVIDSON, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

March 10, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael L. Hanley, Vernon J. Petri & Associates, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Mark R. Smith, Smith Fisher Maas & Howard, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Brian Tincher argues that the trial court erred when it awarded him post-judgment interest from the date of its entry of judgment in July 2002 instead of from the date of the original jury verdict in September 1999. Tincher also argues that the trial court erred when it failed to award him pre-judgment interest. Because we find that Indiana Code § 24-4.6-1-101 requires post-judgment interest to accrue from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases