WEINBERGER v. MAPLEWOOD REVIEW

No. C7-01-2021.

668 N.W.2d 667 (2003)

Richard WEINBERGER, petitioner, Appellant, and Independent School District No. 622, et. al., Defendants, v. MAPLEWOOD REVIEW, et. al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 11, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen W. Cooper, Stacey R. Everson, The Cooper Law Firm, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.

Mark A. Anfinson, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.

John Borger, Eric E. Jorstad, Patricia R. Stembridge, Faegre & Benson, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Minnesota Society of Professional Journalists.

Lucy A. Dalglish, Arlington, VA, for Amicus Curiae for Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press; Society of Professional Journalists; The Newspaper Guild-CWA; and The Minnesota Newspaper Guild Typographical Union in Support of Respondents.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This appeal arises from appellant Richard Weinberger's motion to compel the Maplewood Review and two of its reporters, Jason Tarasek and Wally Wakefield,1 to disclose the identity of certain sources quoted in an article published by the Maplewood Review in January of 1997. Weinberger sought the identity of the sources in connection with a lawsuit he brought against Independent School District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases