U.S. v. MARSHALL

No. 01-56061.

338 F.3d 990 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pierre Clifton MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 23, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pierre Clifton Marshall, pro se, Taft, CA, defendant-appellant.

Steven R. Welk, Assistant United States Attorney, Asset Forfeiture Section, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, and THOMPSON and GRABER, Circuit Judges.


Submitted April 7, 2003* — Pasadena, California.

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge.

The defendant in this case was entitled to the return of a parcel of forfeited real property but, because the government had sold the property, the monetary equivalent had to be restored to him instead. We are called on to decide what date should be used for the substitute valuation. We agree with the district court that the appropriate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases