CUMMINS, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
The SUPERIOR COURT of Riverside County, Respondent;
Edward D. Cox et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 23, 2003.
Review Granted September 10, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Foley & Lardner, Tami S. Smason, Leila Nourani, and Shauhin Talesh, Los Angeles, for Petitioner Cummins, Inc.
Sutton & Murphy, Thomas M. Murphy, Mission Viejo, and Patrick J. Wehage, for Petitioner Winnebago Industries, Inc.
No appearance for Respondent.
Law Offices of Lawrence J. Hutchens, Lawrence J. Hutchens and Michael S. Humphries, Bellflower, for Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.
OPINION
GAUT, Acting P.J.
We hold that Civil Code section 1793.2, subdivision (d),1 a provision of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the Act), section 1790 et seq., may be applied to a manufacturer whose goods are sold in this state even though the particular good in question was purchased in another state. We conclude, therefore, that the defendant manufacturer's motion for summary adjudication was properly denied by the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.