1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 655 N.W.2d
  5. 655 N.W.2d 645 (2003)
 

PODVIN v. JAMAR CO.

Nos. C0-02-1075, C1-02-1182, C3-02-1183, C5-02-1184 and C7-02-1185.

655 N.W.2d 645 (2003)

Joseph PODVIN, et al., Respondents, v. The JAMAR COMPANY, et al., Appellants, A.H. Bennett Company, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 14, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Strom, Sieben, Polk, LaVerdiere, Jones & Hawn, P.A., Hastings, MN, for respondents.

Richard J. Leighton, Downs Reyelts Leighton Bateman & Hylden, Ltd., Duluth, MN, for appellants.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge, LANSING, Judge, and MINGE, Judge.

O P I N I O N

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal involves personal-injury litigation against two related corporations that voluntarily dissolved in 1985. The corporations moved to dismiss for insufficiency of process, arguing that service of process under Minn.Stat. § 5.25, subd. 5 (2000), could not be accomplished because the claims against the dissolved corporations were barred by Minn.Stat. §§ 302A.729, .781 (1984). The district court denied the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases