HATTON v. BONNER

No. 02-15586.

346 F.3d 938 (2003)

David Clinton HATTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward BONNER, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 8, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Rothschild and M. Bradley Wishek, Rothschild, Wishek & Sands, Sacramento, California, for the petitioner-appellant.

Janet E. Neeley, Deputy Attorney General, State of California, Sacramento, California, for the respondent-appellee.

Before: SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM McLANE WARDLAW, and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges.


Argued and Submitted June 9, 2003 — San Francisco, California.

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge.

We are called on to decide whether the state court's decision, upholding the application of California's sex-offender registration statute to Petitioner David Hatton, involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law or was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. Because we answer that question "no," we must affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases