1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 347 F.3d
  5. 347 F.3d 935 (2003)
 

POLYMER INDUSTRIAL PRODS. v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE

No. 03-1176.

347 F.3d 935 (2003)

POLYMER INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS COMPANY and Polymer Enterprises Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied November 26, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Decker, Gefsky & Lehman, P.C., of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Regan J. Fay, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Jenny L. Sheaffer; and Gregory A. Castanias, Jones, Day, Reavis, & Pogue, of Washington, DC.

Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing En Banc Denied November 26, 2003*.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio dismissed the infringement suit brought by Polymer Industrial Products Company and Polymer Enterprises Corporation (collectively PIPCO). Polymer Indus. Prods. Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 211 F.R.D. 312 (N.D.Ohio 2002). Because PIPCO's infringement claim was a compulsory counterclaim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases