U.S. v. DOE

No. 02-50445.

351 F.3d 929 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed December 9, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Ragen, San Diego, California, for the defendant-appellant.

Carol C. Lam, United States Attorney, Laura E. Duffy, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: Raymond C. Fisher and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges, and James C. Mahan, District Judge.


Argued and Submitted September 9, 2003 — Pasadena, California.

OPINION

MAHAN, District Judge.

John Doe appeals the district court's denial of the government's second motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) for reduction of the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to import cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963.

The district court originally sentenced Doe to 210-months...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases