LITTEL v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.

No. CV-02-08836 CAS.

259 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2003)

Roger LITTEL, Louann Pleasant, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., Bridgestone Corp., Does 1 through 100, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

January 8, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gail M. Lisoni, Joseph L. Lisoni, Lisoni & Lisoni, Pasadena, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Richard T. Williams, Marrian Seyean Chang, Holland & Knight, Stephen T. Owens, Michael T. Purleski, Adam Randall Fox, Squire Sanders & Dempsey, Los Angeles, CA, Thomas S. Kilbane, Joseph C. Weinstein, Roger M. Gold, Squire Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, OH, for Defendants.


ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO SPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

SNYDER, District Judge.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The instant action arises out of the alleged manufacture and sale of defectively designed automobile tires. On August 12, 2002, plaintiffs Roger Littel and Louann Pleasant, both California residents, commenced this action in Riverside County Superior Court against defendants Bridgestone/Firestone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases