1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 657 N.W.2d
  5. 657 N.W.2d 611 (2003)
 

THUL v. STATE

No. C9-02-1365.

657 N.W.2d 611 (2003)

Steven M. THUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Meshbesher, Meshbesher & Associates, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul; and Wilbur F. Dorn, Ham Lake City Attorney, Dorn Law Firm, Ltd., Blaine, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, HUDSON, Judge, and PORITSKY, Judge.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Steven M. Thul challenges the denial of his petition for postconviction relief for violating City of Ham Lake, Minn., City Code § 9-470 (2000). The postconviction court determined that the ordinance at issue did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and was not constitutionally void for vagueness.

FACTS

In October of 1998, appellant received the first in a series of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases