1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 345 F.3d
  5. 345 F.3d 922 (2003)
 

GORDON v. NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AND MULLEN ADVERT.

No. 01-2274.

345 F.3d 922 (2003)

Stephen F. Gordon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nextel Communications and Mullen Advertising, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: October 6, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: John E. Nemazi, BROOKS & KUSHMAN, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellant. Herschel P. Fink, HONIGMAN, MILLER, SCHWARTZ & COHN, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellees.

ON BRIEF: Robert C. Brandenburg, BROOKS & KUSHMAN, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellant.

Herschel P. Fink, Cynthia G. Thomas, HONIGMAN, MILLER, SCHWARTZ & COHN, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellees.

Before: MERRITT and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge; DUPLANTIER, District Judge.

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Stephen F. Gordon brought suit against Nextel Communications and Nextel's advertising agency, Mullen Advertising, Inc., for copyright infringement for the unauthorized use of several of Gordon's dental illustrations in a television commercial for Nextel's two-way text messaging. The district court found that Gordon created the illustrations; nevertheless, the court granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases