1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 818 A.2d
  5. 818 A.2d 448 (2003)
 

CUESTA v. CLASSIC WHEELS, INC.

818 A.2d 448 (2003)

358 N.J. Super. 512

Carlos A. CUESTA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CLASSIC WHEELS, INC., Defendant/Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 21, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Rich, Verona, argued the cause for appellant.

Anthony M. Prieto argued the cause for respondent (Prieto & Cohen, attorneys; Mr. Prieto, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, WALLACE, JR. and AXELRAD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WALLACE, JR., J.A.D.

Plaintiff Carlos Cuesta appeals from a judgment entered in connection with the complaint he filed against defendant Classic Wheels, Inc., alleging, in part, violation of the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to 106 (the Act). The trial court found that, although defendant violated the Act, plaintiff failed to establish damages. Consequently, the trial court dismissed the complaint. On appeal,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases