Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the photo array that was shown to the complainant was not unduly suggestive. Accordingly, the hearing court properly declined to suppress the identification testimony of the complainant, who had identified the defendant from the photo array (see People v Wright,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.