1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 671 N.W.2d
  5. 671 N.W.2d 591 (2003)
 

STATE v. BLOOFLAT

No. C0-02-2095.

671 N.W.2d 591 (2003)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Archie B. BLOOFLAT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 18, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, and Joseph Sylvan Mayers, Sauk Rapids, for respondent.

Jeffrey Stephen Sheridan, Eagan, for appellant.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge; KLAPHAKE, Judge and HALBROOKS, Judge.

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

On appeal from his convictions of driving after cancellation and aggravated driving under the influence (DWI), appellant-defendant argues that imposing mandatory consecutive sentences for a crime and its lesser-included offense is unconstitutional because it creates sentences of more than one year without the right to a twelve-person jury trial. After reviewing the statutes at issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases