EDINA DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. HURRLE

No. A03-32.

670 N.W.2d 592 (2003)

EDINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a/k/a Edina Development, Inc., Appellant, v. Larry HURRLE, a/k/a Lawrence C. Hurrle, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 21, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry M. Wertheim, Kennedy & Graven, Chtd., Minneapolis, MN; and John J. Berglund, Scott C. Baumgartner, Berglund & Baumgartner, Ltd., Anoka, MN, for appellant.

Gary A. Van Cleve, Christopher J. Deike, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., Bloomington, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, Presiding Judge, PETERSON, Judge, and HALBROOKS, Judge.


OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

On appeal from summary judgment, appellant argues that the district court erred in holding that it did not have the right to exercise its option under an option agreement because appellant did not fulfill all of the conditions of a separate agreement to purchase 162 acres of land. Because we conclude that the district court did not err, we affirm.

FACTS

Respondents Larry Hurrle, Carol Hurrle, and Timothy Hurrle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases