1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 65 P.3d
  5. 65 P.3d 1192 (2003)
 

YOUNG v. CLARK

No. 71905-5.

65 P.3d 1192 (2003)

149 Wash.2d 130

Colleen Rose YOUNG, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of William Mathis Young, Petitioners, v. Arthur CLARK and Jane Doe Clark, husband and wife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided April 3, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dominic Bacetich, Everett, for petitioners.

Bret Simmons, Bellingham, for respondents.

SANDERS, J.

The question is whether the filing restrictions of former RCW 4.12.020(3) (1941), amended by Laws of 2001, ch. 45, § 2, limit subject matter jurisdiction as among superior courts or whether the restrictions relate only to the venue where such actions may be tried. We hold RCW 4.12.020 relates only to venue, overruling Aydelotte v. Audette, 110 Wn.2d 249, 253, 750 P.2d 1276

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases