IN RE REILLY


837 A.2d 412 (2003)

364 N.J. Super. 519

In re Application of Charles V. REILLY, Robert A Hutton and Sean Reilly to Contest the Validity of the Enactment of Assembly Bill 3359 (P.L.2001, c. 364).

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 9, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles V. Reilly, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Coleen Louden, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney; Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General and Ms. Louden, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, WELLS and FISHER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

Three citizens of New Jersey brought this action pursuant to N.J.S.A. 1:7-1 to -7 for a declaration that chapter 364 of the Laws of 2001, subsequently codified as N.J.S.A. 18A:36-34, is void because it was not enacted in the manner required by the New Jersey Constitution.1 The applicants contend that chapter 364 is void...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases