1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 330 F.3d
  5. 330 F.3d 919 (2003)
 

DENIUS v. DUNLAP

Nos. 01-3422, 01-3575, 02-1398 and 02-1460.

330 F.3d 919 (2003)

Ronald C. DENIUS, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Wayne DUNLAP and Peter Thomas, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, and Gary Sadler, Defendant-Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 30, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Brian Heller (argued), Mary L. Leahy, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Erik G. Light (argued), Office of Attorney General, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and COFFEY and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

FLAUM, Chief Judge.

Ronald Denius claims that officials of Illinois's Lincoln Challenge Program ("LCP") violated his constitutional rights by requiring him to authorize the release of a broad range of personal information as a condition of continued employment. Initially, the district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on grounds of qualified immunity, but on appeal we reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings. Denius v. Dunlap, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases