Ordered that the amended order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant correctly contends that the Family Court erred in admitting into evidence the testimony of a witness, who was allegedly sexually abused by the appellant in the past, under the motive, intent, identity, and absence of mistake or accident exceptions to the Molineux rule (see People v Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264 [1901]; see also People v Vargas,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.