Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the jury verdict convicting her of attempted murder in the second degree and acquitting her of attempted arson in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was repugnant or inconsistent is not preserved for appellate review, as no objection was raised before the jury was discharged (see People v Balbuena,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.