1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 74 P.3d
  5. 74 P.3d 1163 (2003)
 

KARSON v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COM'N

0004-03416; A117116.

74 P.3d 1163 (2003)

189 Or. App. 223

Mark KARSON, Appellant, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, a division of the State of Oregon, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 13, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David R. Nepom, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Jas. Jeffrey Adams, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and KISTLER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

KISTLER, J.

On summary judgment, the trial court ruled, among other things, that plaintiff is not an employee of defendant Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) and that the OLCC has no statutory obligation to negotiate contract terms with him. The trial court entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

The OLCC is responsible for the sale of alcohol in Oregon and is authorized to establish retail liquor stores. ORS 471.725. The OLCC...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases