1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 79 P.3d
  5. 79 P.3d 1154 (2003)
 

MALTED MOUSSE, INC. v. STEINMETZ

No. 73120-9.

79 P.3d 1154 (2003)

150 Wash.2d 518

MALTED MOUSSE, INC., a Washington corporation, Petitioner, v. Michael A. STEINMETZ, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided November 13, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Burns, Law Offices of McFerran & Helsdon, Tacoma, for Petitioner.

Michael A. Steinmetz, Mesa, AZ, for Respondent.

SANDERS, J.

This case requires us to address whether the trial de novo appeal process from mandatory arbitration under chapter 7.06 RCW sufficiently protects the rights of small claimants who are aggrieved by an arbitrator's erroneous act. We hold it does and that trial de novo is the sole method to seek judicial review from mandatory arbitration. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases