1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 296 F.Supp.2d
  5. 296 F.Supp.2d 937 (2003)
 

DIRECTV, INC. v. BEECHER

Nos. 1:03-CV-0309 DFH, 1:03-CV-0312 DFH, 1:03-CV-0316 DFH, 1:03-CV-0310 DFH, 1:03-CV-0313 DFH, 1:03-CV-0317 DFH, 1:03-CV-0311 DFH, 1:03-CV-0315 DFH, 1:03-CV-0318 DFH, 1:03-CV-0319 DFH, 1:03-CV-0320 DFH, 1:03-CV-0321 DFH, 1:03-CV-0322 DFH, 1:03-CV-0323 DFH, 1:03-CV-0324 DFH, 1:03-CV-0326 DFH.

296 F.Supp.2d 937 (2003)

DIRECTV, INC., Plaintiff, v. Robert BEECHER, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. David Cashe, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Johnnie Dixon, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Kevin Hall, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Danny Hubbard, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Ted A. Wooley, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Robert Lucas, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Jack Overy, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Rondal Randall, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Ken Shutt, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Suzi Mathies, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Patrick Barrett, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Jennifer Johnson, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. James Tompkins, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Gayle L. Pruitt, et al., Defendants. DirecTV, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Kellie Terry, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

November 7, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Wilkins, Robert L. Gauss, John T. Murphy, Ice Miller, Indianapolis, IN, for plaintiff.

Bruce D. Brattain, Brattain & Minnix, Indianapolis, IN, Mark K. Dudley, Young, Riley, Dudley & Debrota, Indianapolis, IN, Paul B. Overhauser, Overhauser Law Offices, Greenfield, IN, Gary P. Price, Suzanne Lee Robinson, Lewis & Kappes, Indianapolis, IN, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff DirecTV, Inc. has filed numerous actions against individuals who allegedly purchased devices useful for intercepting encrypted television signals broadcast by plaintiff. The complaints seek relief under 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) for interception of copyrighted materials; under 18 U.S.C. § 2520 for interception of signals and/or possession of devices primarily useful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases