STATE v. APPLIN

No. 49454-6-I.

67 P.3d 1152 (2003)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Blaine Alan APPLIN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

May 5, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy Collins, Wash.App. Project, Sea., WA, for Appellant.

Seth Fine, James Krider, Rebecca Quirk, Sno. Co. Pros. Atty., Everett, WA, for Respondent.


ELLINGTON, J.

Blaine Applin killed Dan Jess. He asserted an insanity defense, contending he was acting under a delusional belief that he had received a direct command from God. He challenges the jury instructions, contending the court erred in refusing to define right and wrong. No such definition is generally required, however, and the evidence at trial did not call for a special instruction here. Applin's other claimed errors are either invited or otherwise unreviewable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases